A self-playing journey through the framework, from choosing what to protect to a complete resilience verdict including compliance mapping and an at-risk contrast. It plays like a video, loops automatically, and you can pause or scrub at any time.
Illustrative walkthrough, not the production tool
self-playing
Scene 1 of 7 · Select What to Protect
Validator resilience
Wallet & custody
Settlement
Smart-contract execution
Network posture
The selected target determines which signals and enforcement actions apply.
Live signals · Validator resilience
Signing hardware
Tamper mesh nominal, thermal & EMFI within range
measured
Key exposure
Hybrid PQC signing, no public-key exposure
measured
Automated-attack pressure
Probe rate low, no coordinated pattern
assessed
Network topology
Well connected, no partition or clustering risk
assessed
Each signal is captured with its source and quality. Signals not used by the selected target are marked not applicable.
Score ready
QABRE combines the applicable signals into one live score, checked before the validator is allowed to sign.
Resilience Verdict
QABRE · Illustrative example
RESILIENT
Assurance
HIGH
Evidence confidence
HIGH
Signal coverage
4 of 4 applicable
COMPLETE
Post-quantum readiness
hybrid signing
FULL
Enforcement
Validator cleared to sign
Dimension ratings
Signing hardware integrity
STRONG
Key & quantum exposure
STRONG
Automated-attack pressure
ADEQUATE
Network exposure
ADEQUATE
Entropy provenance
STRONG
Consensus timing
N/A
Key insight
Strongest applicable factor: signing hardware integrity. Largest opportunity: network exposure. The validator is cleared to participate in consensus.
One live score, resolved into a verdict an operator can defend, with the driver of the result named.
Regulatory relevance mapping, linked to the RESILIENT verdict
NIST FIPS 203/204
PQC algorithm standards
Aligns with NIST PQC standards for high-assurance use.
ISO/IEC 27001:2022
A.8.24 Use of cryptography
Cryptographic controls under A.8.24 are supported.
DORA (EU 2022/2554)
Article 9
ICT cryptographic resilience under Article 9 is supported.
NIS2 (EU 2022/2555)
Article 21
State-of-the-art cryptography expectation under Article 21 is supported.
NSM-10
quantum-resistant migration
Aligns with NSM-10 migration guidance.
Every verdict maps to the frameworks organisations are assessed against.
Resilience Verdict
Same flow · A different result
AT RISK
Assurance
LOW
Driver
Signing hardware tamper detected
Enforcement
Validator removed from consensus
Action taken
Weight cut, key rotation forced
Result
No malicious block signed
Dimension ratings
Key & quantum exposure
STRONG
Entropy provenance
STRONG
Signing hardware integrity
CRITICAL
Network exposure
N/A
Key insight
Exposure driven by signing hardware integrity; a critical weakness caps the verdict. Strong keys and algorithm choice do not offset a compromised signing device.
QABRE declines to clear a validator with a critical weakness, removes it before it can sign, and explains why.
One live score. Six evidence signals. A verdict you can defend.