Quantum-AI blockchain resilience

QABRE: How it works

Real-Time Resilience Framework · Physivitis

A narrated journey through the framework, from choosing what to protect to a complete resilience verdict including compliance mapping and an at-risk contrast. It plays like a video, loops automatically, and you can pause or scrub at any time.

Illustrative walkthrough, not the production tool

narrated walkthrough

Scene 1 of 7 · Select What to Protect

Validator resilience

Wallet & custody

Settlement

Smart-contract execution

Network posture

The selected target determines which signals and enforcement actions apply.

Live signals · Validator resilience

Signing hardware

Tamper mesh nominal, thermal & EMFI within range

measured

Key exposure

Hybrid PQC signing, no public-key exposure

measured

Automated-attack pressure

Probe rate low, no coordinated pattern

assessed

Network topology

Well connected, no partition or clustering risk

assessed

Each signal is captured with its source and quality. Signals not used by the selected target are marked not applicable.

Score ready

QABRE combines the applicable signals into one live score, checked before the validator is allowed to sign.

Resilience Verdict

QABRE · Illustrative example

RESILIENT

Assurance

HIGH

Evidence confidence

HIGH

Signal coverage

4 of 4 applicable

COMPLETE

Post-quantum readiness

hybrid signing

FULL

Enforcement

Validator cleared to sign

Dimension ratings

Signing hardware integrity

STRONG

Key & quantum exposure

STRONG

Automated-attack pressure

ADEQUATE

Network exposure

ADEQUATE

Entropy provenance

STRONG

Consensus timing

N/A

Key insight

Strongest applicable factor: signing hardware integrity. Largest opportunity: network exposure. The validator is cleared to participate in consensus.

One live score, resolved into a verdict an operator can defend, with the driver of the result named.

Regulatory relevance mapping, linked to the RESILIENT verdict

NIST FIPS 203/204

PQC algorithm standards

Aligns with NIST PQC standards for high-assurance use.

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

A.8.24 Use of cryptography

Cryptographic controls under A.8.24 are supported.

DORA (EU 2022/2554)

Article 9

ICT cryptographic resilience under Article 9 is supported.

NIS2 (EU 2022/2555)

Article 21

State-of-the-art cryptography expectation under Article 21 is supported.

NSM-10

quantum-resistant migration

Aligns with NSM-10 migration guidance.

Every verdict maps to the frameworks organisations are assessed against.

Resilience Verdict

Same flow · A different result

AT RISK

Assurance

LOW

Driver

Signing hardware tamper detected

Enforcement

Validator removed from consensus

Action taken

Weight cut, key rotation forced

Result

No malicious block signed

Dimension ratings

Key & quantum exposure

STRONG

Entropy provenance

STRONG

Signing hardware integrity

CRITICAL

Network exposure

N/A

Key insight

Exposure driven by signing hardware integrity; a critical weakness caps the verdict. Strong keys and algorithm choice do not offset a compromised signing device.

QABRE declines to clear a validator with a critical weakness, removes it before it can sign, and explains why.

One live score. Six evidence signals. A verdict you can defend.

Apply for early access Read the white paper

Validator resilience

Wallet & custody

Settlement

Smart-contract execution

Network posture

The selected target determines which signals and enforcement actions apply.

Back to QABRE