Technical Whitepaper · QRESB Framework

Beyond Algorithm Migration

A Six-Dimension Framework for Auditable Cryptographic Security in the Post-Quantum Era

By Rene Claudel MugenziPhysivitis Ltd16 pages · v1.2Patent Pending

The measurement gap

Post-quantum algorithm migration is necessary. It is not sufficient. Migration addresses one of six evidence dimensions of cryptographic assurance. It does not address five others: entropy quality, protocol and reconciliation leakage, side-channel resistance, architecture and network exposure, and finite-size effects.

Organisations completing post-quantum migration and relying solely on algorithm replacement as evidence of resilience will find, in many cases, that their actual assurance posture is materially lower than their compliance posture suggests.

QRESB addresses this gap. It unifies six independent evidence dimensions into a structured assessment with a QRESB Assurance Index, evidence confidence, and assessment coverage, suitable for board, regulator, customer, and continuous assurance reporting.

The six dimensions

Entropy Quality

Quality, validation and available min-entropy of randomness used for keys, seeds and nonces

Post-Quantum Cryptography

Algorithm selection, parameter sets, implementation status and migration maturity

Protocol and Reconciliation Leakage

Information leaked during protocol operation and key reconciliation procedures

Side-Channel Resistance

Evidence concerning timing, power, electromagnetic, cache and fault attacks

Architecture and Network Exposure

Reachability, segmentation, trust concentration and potential attack paths

Finite-Size Effects

Statistical penalties caused by finite samples, blocks or observations

Inside the document

What you will read

  • ✓Why algorithm migration alone is insufficient for cryptographic resilience
  • ✓The six-dimension framework: entropy, hardness, leakage, side-channels, topology, and finite-key overhead
  • ✓How to unify six independent evidence dimensions into a structured assessment with a QRESB Assurance Index
  • ✓Regulatory context: DORA, NIS2, NSM-10, NIST FIPS 203/204/205, ISO 27001, PCI DSS v4.0
  • ✓Real-world applications: VPNs, financial systems, QKD, satellite communications, critical infrastructure
  • ✓Integration with continuous assurance and deployment gating workflows
  • ✓Commercial availability through the Unified Security Margin Calculator (USMC)

Unified verdict

QRESB produces a structured assessment with an overall assurance verdict, a QRESB Assurance Index, evidence confidence, and assessment coverage, mapped to four verdict categories plus an abstention state. The QRESB Assurance Index is a composite decision-support metric. It is not a direct measurement of brute-force security strength in bits unless the report explicitly identifies the output as an estimated security margin and states it as a conservative lower bound.

ROBUSTStrong assurance across the assessed dimensions, with substantial headroom against current and projected threats.
MARGINALAssurance is present but below requirements in one or more areas; targeted remediation is advisable.
WEAKAssurance is materially below requirements; remediation is required to meet the stated assurance level.
AT RISKA critical weakness is present; the system is not adequately protecting the assets it is intended to protect.
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCENot a verdict but an abstention: the supplied evidence is too limited to produce a reliable assessment.
Free Download

Get the whitepaper

Enter your details below. The download link will be sent to your work email within a few minutes.

Ready to audit your cryptographic security posture?

Download the whitepaper, or go straight to the Unified Security Margin Calculator.

Try USMC Now →

We use a small number of cookies to make this website work and to understand how it is used. You can accept them or continue with only the essential ones. Read our Cookie Policy.